What

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

*gasp* what is this? A new pinned post?

Hello, I am Nev, late 20s Queer AF villain fucker, writer and artist and overall very not sfw chronic shitposter.

I’m a fandom ancient, I’ve been here since livejournal days, come yell about problematic ships at me that I’m in love with and I’ll tell you tales of old

I am a mild disaster and have scattered myself across tumblr for varying fandoms.

For Anime Flailing, BNHA, FMA, JJK, YYH, etc, come love me at: @greedtheavalicious

For CM shitposting find me at: @thebostonreaper

My writing flailing is over here @nevtelenwriting

And the occassional art thing but mostly just art tutorials and references: @nevtelendoots

Nowadays I am getting more active on twitter, so find me there at nevtelenwriting

Pinned Post about me come yell with meeeee
anniflamma
anniflamma

Trigger warning: topic about SA, aka Im gonna rant about the suitors plan

----

So, I’m going to talk about something I actually dislike ALOT in Epic: The Musical. The whole subplot about the suitors wanting to gangrape Penelope. The more I think about it, the more I realize how unnecessary this addition to the story is.

If you removed it, it wouldn’t change the outcomes of the story at all. Odysseus would still kill them. Nothing has ever stopped him before— neither the infant, Polites’ ideology, nor the fact that he willingly led his remaining crew to certain death while always ensuring his own safety above theirs. But somehow, a group of 20-year-olds is the line he can’t cross????? Like, “Oh no, they’re just rude guests, I can’t kill them!🙁” It doesn’t make sense. Odysseus would kill them either way, they don’t need to be wannabe gangrapists to motivate him. It’s entirely in character for him to do so without additional justification.

Keep reading

anniflamma
anniflamma

Trigger warning: topic about SA, aka Im gonna rant about the suitors plan

----

So, I’m going to talk about something I actually dislike ALOT in Epic: The Musical. The whole subplot about the suitors wanting to gangrape Penelope. The more I think about it, the more I realize how unnecessary this addition to the story is.

If you removed it, it wouldn’t change the outcomes of the story at all. Odysseus would still kill them. Nothing has ever stopped him before— neither the infant, Polites’ ideology, nor the fact that he willingly led his remaining crew to certain death while always ensuring his own safety above theirs. But somehow, a group of 20-year-olds is the line he can’t cross????? Like, “Oh no, they’re just rude guests, I can’t kill them!🙁” It doesn’t make sense. Odysseus would kill them either way, they don’t need to be wannabe gangrapists to motivate him. It’s entirely in character for him to do so without additional justification.

Keep reading

silverquill101
spyroforlife

gonna post a controversial take alright are y’all ready??

actually typing out emoticons like XD and :D and :V never should have gone out of fashion and you can pry them out of my cold dead hands okay I know emojis are fun but THEY DON’T CAPTURE THE EMOTION IN THE SAME WAY

so like

…yeah that was basically it, thanks for reading

reynaruina

also websites that  automatically replace your typed out <3 and :D with emojis upon sending them are a Danger To Everything That’s Good In The World

cumaeansibyl

bring back nose smilies :-)

porcupine-girl

There is no emoji that captures what I mean by :P (I do NOT mean “hur hur goofy-ass face!”) and the one for :^/ is not great. And lest we forget, 🤷🏻‍♀️ is absolutely inadequate compared to ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

tempest-caller

Faces no emoji has ever managed to capture, imo:

:P

^_^

:3

^u^

:/

O.o

0.0

>:/

<(^u^)>

batneko

I am too old to stop using XD

therev28

i have never yet found an emoji that fully captures the shifty energy of: 

>_>

<_<

spyderqueen

Oh man, I’ve missed O.o

Especially alternating to really capture how boggled you are.

O.o

o.O

O.o

charlottemadison42

Whatever the name of this team is, I am on it

eeveedatparty

this is   awesome

defective-replicant

._. is pretty good too and 😐 just ISN’T THE SAME

incubisexual

XD, ^-^, :3, <3, and =P until death

zetsubonna

¬_¬ is the most eloquent keystroke combo

booksandcatslover

U_U is my fav, and also O_O

thehornedwitch

the SHEER MISCHIEF of OvO

weaselle

me af

littlejowo

Some personal favorites of my own:


:3c

>:3c

OF7o

òwó

ú_ù

n_n

owo

oTL

=(Ô . Ô)=

revcleo

Kaomoji (≧ᗜ≦)

catbountry

>:3

Rawr

madjesters1

:D

fangirltothefullest

Personal faves:

TTwTT

83

8U

>8U

>8Oc

>////<

>////>

(-^_^-)

( 6w6;;;)

( > ^ <;;)

=(^w^)=

\o/

OTL

makingqueerhistory
makingqueerhistory

Queer instincts are sacred. While there is obviously worth in proving and finding definites, there is also value in connecting history with intuition. It might not bring certainty, but it can bring connection, and that connection is worth something. History isn't a mirror, but you can find resonance there, and that resonance is important even if it is just for you and has no rippling implications.

Your connection and reflection in history do not need to be provable to be felt. Just because someone might not have the same set of identities as you do, that doesn't mean you cannot relate to their understanding of themself. Queerness is not about easily defined boundaries, and queer history reflects that. You may never find your exact set of identities in someone else from the past, but you also may find yourself relating to someone unexpectedly if you let go of the academic need to validate and find proof for these emotions. Sometimes, feelings are just feelings, and they need no more basis than that. You may not be able to claim a person as queer, but your queer heart can still connect to them.

vaspider
absurdcrow

image

CURRENTLY SOBBING. OK SOO, RIPLEY IS GAY?!!

and lambert is actually trans?? 😭😭

warningsine

There's no denying that "Alien" is a landmark in sci-fi horror and the "monstrous feminine." Many consider it the first feminist blockbuster.

That being said, I'm not sure about the validity of some of these claims.

I'll have to check Lea Delaria's quote, but before I do:

  1. Lambert was indeed a trans woman. For anyone doubting this:
image


REMARKS:

Subject is Despin Convert at birth (male to female). So far no indication of suppressed trauma related to gender alteration. Subject's I.Q. at level 4.6 GMA personality at 4.2. Indicates that subject's social counts are too low for large crew, up mode status, and has been routinely assigned small crew cyrosleep mode duties which been performed adequately.

Slight hyperactivity and nervousness diagnosed and Loxy-Clav M (oral ingestion) has been successful as self-administered treatment.

Moderate intelligence and performance abilities did not substantially increase after security patrol navigation duties and subject was therefore re-assigned long range cyrosleep duties on cargo transports and tugs. Current assessment indicates subject should not be upgraded until after extensive full range DOQ testing and Frakes-Stephen orientation is applied

Above was never acted upon due to employment discontinuity

Also, here and here.

2. I haven't heard before that Ripley was originally written as a man. What I've heard is that the characters were written as gender neutral. That's why they refer to each other by their surnames. (Here's an interesting Scott interview where he talks about the characters.) But choosing to cast Ripley as a woman was indeed groundbreaking.

3. I'm trying to figure out which book Lea Delaria was talking about. Because if it's Alan Dean Foster's novelization, which was released on March 29, two months before the film came out (May 25, 1979), Ellen Ripley is a woman in it.

4. The OG rainbow flag made its debut on June 25, 1978. The OG film was filmed over 14 weeks from July 5 to October 21, 1978. So, hey, maybe the rainbow patches that all crew members--not just Lambert and Ripley--were wearing were a nod to the LGBT community.

image
image

5. Sigourney Weaver is a lesbian icon for portraying Ellen Ripley, no doubt about it.

Unlike many heroines of that era, Ripley didn't conform to romantic notions or motherhood (something that changed in the sequel) and embodied masculine action hero ideals.

But was she meant to be a lesbian?

In the early stages of script writing, there was a Dallas/Ripley sex scene that was scrapped and never filmed, because they felt it "seemed out of place."

In the theatrical cut commentary, Ridley Scott said that he considered same sex-relationships between the crew members.

“There was a line through the movie which had a … more by innuendo than anything else, that there was something going on between Dallas and she [Ripley]. And then later, I thought what was really curious was -could be interesting- there was something going on between her and Veronica, which I thought was far more probable. I mean a hundred years from now, you know, that’s certainly not gonna be remarkable in space. In fact, in space relationships are probably gonna be discouraged, and if you have the need for sex, it can be with either gender. Really doesn’t matter, right?

“Should we have an inference of a lesbian or gay relationship or not? It would have been kind of interesting. Today I’d probably do that just to thicken up the layers in the characters.”

There was also Vasquez, who looked and acted like a butch.

“With Vasquez, I never said she was straight or gay, because to her it was nobody’s business.”

Last but not least, there's a whole discussion to be had about Xenomorphs as genderbending (phallic head and tail, vaginal shape during the facehugger stage) rapist parasites, impregnating their hosts against their will.